Reference — Models

The right model for the job.

The gap between open-weight and frontier models has nearly closed. The question is no longer "can open-weight compete?" It's "which model fits your workload, your compliance requirements, and your budget."

Quick pick

Start here.

Maximum security & US-made

gpt-oss-120b

Apache 2.0, on-premises, US-made (OpenAI). Runs on a single 80GB GPU, with strong reasoning and tool use you can fully audit and own.

Maximum intelligence

Claude Fable 5.1

Via API. Adaptive reasoning, 1M-token context. Pay per use.

Near-frontier, full control

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Hosted dedicated. A US open-weight family you own outright, with weights, training data and recipes published under OpenMDW-1.1. (If origin isn't a constraint, GLM-5.3 leads agentic coding and Qwen3.8-Max now tops most open-weight rankings.)

Closed models

Frontier models (API-only).

Maximum intelligence, minimum control, priced per token.

ModelProviderBest forContext
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · USDeepest reasoning, complex coding, adaptive thinking1M
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · USLong-horizon agentic work, computer and browser use1.05M
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle · USMultimodal, video, long context1M
Grok 4.6xAI · USFast, token-efficient reasoning and coding500K
Muse Spark 1.3Meta · USMultimodal reasoning, tool use, agent orchestration1M

Anthropic's top tier is Fable 5.1 (September 2026); Opus 5 sits just below it at half the token price. Pricing changes monthly and long context can cost more (GPT-6 Astra doubles its input rate past 272K tokens), so we quote current rates in every proposal

Trade-off: Maximum intelligence. Your data transits the vendor's infrastructure on every API call. The enterprise agreements we configure prevent training on your data.

Open models

Open-weight models (self-hostable).

Full control, self-hosted or on dedicated infrastructure.

ModelLabParametersLicenseBest for
Gemma 4Google · US2B–31B dense + 26B MoEApache 2.0Multimodal, 140+ languages, efficient edge-to-server
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA · US550B MoE (55B active)OpenMDW-1.1Plans and runs multi-step tasks; tuned for NVIDIA GPUs
gpt-oss-120bOpenAI · US117B MoE (5.1B active)Apache 2.0On-prem reasoning and tool-use on a single 80GB GPU
Poolside Laguna S 2.1Poolside · US118B (MoE)OpenMDW-1.1Agentic coding; punches above its size
InklingThinking Machines · US975B MoE (41B active)Apache 2.0Multimodal open base built for customization
Mistral Large 3Mistral · France675B MoE (41B active)Apache 2.0Multilingual general-purpose work; 256K context
Command A+Cohere · Canada218B MoE (25B active)Apache 2.0Sovereign enterprise RAG with auditable citations
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek · China1.6T MoE (49B active)MITEfficient long-context reasoning; V4.1-Flash sets the cost floor
GLM-5.3Zhipu · China744B MoE (40B active)GLM-5.3 LicenseAgentic coding at very low cost
Kimi K3Moonshot · China2.8T MoE (104B active)Kimi K3 LicenseFrontier agentic reasoning, long context
MiniMax M3MiniMax · China428B MoE (23B active)Community LicenseLong-horizon coding agents; native multimodality
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba · China2.4T MoE (95B active)Qwen3.8-Max LicenseTop open-weight scores; multimodal enterprise flagship
Qwen3.8-27BAlibaba · China27BApache 2.0Small Apache-2.0 option with native image and video input

MoE (Mixture-of-Experts): the model activates only the parts it needs for each request, giving large capacity at lower running cost.

Trade-off: the best open-weight models now sit within a few percent of frontier on public leaderboards, and in August 2026 Alibaba published open weights for its Max-class flagship for the first time. Closed models keep an edge at the very top of reasoning and agentic-coding tasks, but for most business tasks open-weight is production-ready, with zero data leakage, a full audit trail, and a model you own.

Origin matters for some buyers. For organizations that prefer to keep to domestic models, there is now a strong US-made open-weight slate: Gemma, Nemotron, gpt-oss, Poolside Laguna and Inkling, with other Western options from Mistral (France) and Cohere (Canada), and the leading Chinese labs alongside. We match the model to your policy, not the other way around.

Legal

Licenses explained.

LicenseCommercial use?Can modify?Must share changes?
MIT (DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4.1-Flash)YesYesNo
Apache 2.0 (Gemma, gpt-oss, Inkling, Mistral, Command A+, Qwen3.8-27B)YesYesNo
OpenMDW-1.1 (Nemotron, Poolside Laguna)YesYesNo
Custom community (Kimi K3, MiniMax, GLM-5.3, Qwen3.8-Max)Yes (attribution / revenue thresholds apply)YesNo
Proprietary (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Muse Spark)Via API onlyNoN/A

For regulated enterprises that need legal certainty, we recommend Apache 2.0, MIT or OpenMDW-1.1 models: no usage caps, no license surprises.

Framework

Intelligence vs. Control vs. Cost.

IntelligenceControl →FRONTIER (API)Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.1 Promost intelligent · least controlOPEN-WEIGHT (self-hosted)Gemma 4Nemotron 3gpt-ossGLM-5.3DeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.8-MaxMistral L3near-frontier · full control

More control = open-weight on your hardware. More intelligence = frontier via API. The best setup is often both: open-weight for volume, frontier for hard problems.

Model landscape last verified September 16, 2026. This changes fast, and new models are released weekly. Talk to us for current recommendations.

Contact

Which model is right for you?

We'll map your use case to the right model, and the right deployment mode.

Get a model recommendation →